The modalities of flexor tendon reconstruction of the hand correlated with the level of injury and etiologic factor


  • Sanela Salihagić Clinic for reconstructive and plastic surgery, Clincal Center Unversity of Sarajevo
  • Mirsad Muftic Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina



flexor tendon, injury, reconstruction modality


AIM: Successful flexor tendon reconstruction is inevitably connected with local tissue equillibrium and satisfactory joint mobility. The etiologic factors and levels of the flexor tendon injuries determine the selection of the available operative modalities. Postoperative physical therapy prevents contracture formations and has influence on the definitive postoperative outcome.

METHODS: We have evaluated postoperativne results after flexor tendon repair in 116 cases during five-years period. We have used Microsoft Excel program and IBM statistics SPSSv 21 or 22.

RESULTS: Noticable correlation between the type of etiologic factor and the modality of flexor tendon repair has been evaluated. The flexor tendon injuries caused by sharp objects (58.62%) had been treated mostly by primary repair (82.4%). Extensive destruction of tendon tissue caused by the other types of the etiologic agents have represented the indicaton for tenoplasty, which have been applied mainly in Zone II  (40.4%), the most frequently zone of tendon injury in our research (40.52%), with primary and secondary repair

CONCLUSION: There is a very clear correlation between the etiologic factor and the level of the flexor tendon injury with selection of the appropriate operative modality.



1. Lutsky KF, Giang EL, Matzon JL. Flexor Tendon injury, Repair and Rehabilitation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46(1):67-76.
2. Samora JB, Klinefelter RD. Flexor Tendon Reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(1):28-36.
3. Griffin M, Hindocha S, Jordan D, Saleh M, Khan W. An Overview of the Management of Flexor Tendon Injuries.
Open Orthop J. 2012;6:28–35.
4. Kotwal PP, Ansari MT. Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries: Venturing into the no man’s land. Indian J Orthop.
5. Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH. Greens Operative Hand Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011.
6. Salihagić S, Hadžiahmetović Z, Hadžiahmetović-Vavra N. Povrede fleksornog sistema šake u Trauma šake. Sarajevo: Institut za naučnoistraživači rad i razvoj, Univerziteski klinički centar Sarajevo, 2014.
7. Bynum DK, Gilbert JA. Avulsion of the flexor digitorum profundus: Anatomic and biomechanical considerations.
J Hand Surg. 1988;13(2):222-227.
8. Leddy JP, Packer JW. Avulsion of the profundus tendon insertion in athletes. J Hand Surg Am. 1977;2(1):66-69.
9. Silva MJ, Ritty TM, Ditsios K, Burns ME, Boyer MI, Gelberman RH. Tendon injury response: assessment of
biomechanical properties, tissue morphology and viability following flexor digitorum profundus tendon transection.
J Orthop Res. 2004;22(5):990-997.
10. Beris A. Two-Stage Flexor Tendon Reconstruction in Zone II Using a Silicone Rod and a Pedicled Intrasynovial Graft. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2003;28(9):652-660.
11. Hudson DA, de Jager LT. The spaghetti wrist. Simultaneous laceration of the median and ulnar nerves with flexor
tendons at the wrist. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18(2):171-173.




How to Cite

Salihagić, S., & Muftic, M. (2017). The modalities of flexor tendon reconstruction of the hand correlated with the level of injury and etiologic factor. BioMedicine and Surgery, 1(1), 1–5.